Hartwell v. McBeth

1 Del. 363
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 5, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. 363 (Hartwell v. McBeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartwell v. McBeth, 1 Del. 363 (Del. Ct. App. 1834).

Opinion

A majority of the court refused the nonsuit, the chief justice dissenting. The majority agreed that a blank indorsement was sufficient to transfer the right of action to the indorsee, but while it remains in blank he may consider himself as a cestui que use, or servant, and the action may still be brought in the name of the indorser. If the indorser turns the blank indorsement into a special one, as he may do, the property in the note is then transferred to him, and he only could bring the action. Chitty on Bills, 174; Salk. 130; 12 Mod. 193; Selw. N. P. 331-2.

Treating this as an action between the original parties to the note, the coui’t permitted evidence to be given of a want or failure of the consideration, and the plff. finally submitted to a nonsuit. Chitty on Bills, 91.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartwell-v-mcbeth-delsuperct-1834.