Hartup v. Checker Taxicabs of Tampa, Inc.
This text of 208 So. 2d 610 (Hartup v. Checker Taxicabs of Tampa, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 4, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. Motion for attorney fees also denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 So. 2d 610, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartup-v-checker-taxicabs-of-tampa-inc-fla-1968.