Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Hartung v. Planning Commission of Old Lyme

Hartung v. Planning Commission of Old Lyme

556 A.2d 1065, 18 Conn. App. 811, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 111
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 30, 1989
Docket6692
StatusPublished

This text of 556 A.2d 1065 (Hartung v. Planning Commission of Old Lyme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartung v. Planning Commission of Old Lyme, 556 A.2d 1065, 18 Conn. App. 811, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 111 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court dismissed this zoning appeal pursuant to Practice Book § 143 because the plaintiff failed to file a memorandum in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of aggrievement. This court granted certification to appeal the decision of the trial court.

The result in this case is controlled by Burton v. Planning Commission, 209 Conn. 609, 553 A.2d 161 (1989). Contrary to the plaintiff’s argument, his August 17,1987 [812]*812filing of a memorandum of law addressing, inter alia, the issue of aggrievement cannot be deemed a response to the motion to dismiss filed on September 15,1987.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burton v. Planning Commission
553 A.2d 161 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 A.2d 1065, 18 Conn. App. 811, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartung-v-planning-commission-of-old-lyme-connappct-1989.