Hartsough v. Hartsough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hartsough v. Hartsough

270 A.D.2d 349, 705 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2710

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 270 A.D.2d 349 (Hartsough v. Hartsough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartsough v. Hartsough, 270 A.D.2d 349, 705 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered January 21, 1999, which, after a [350]*350hearing, awarded the father custody of the parties’ two children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the father was better able than the mother to place the children’s needs before his own and to foster an ongoing relationship between the children and the noncustodial parent (see, Maloney v Maloney, 208 AD2d 603; Bostinto v Bostinto, 207 AD2d 471).

Although the mother presented evidence of a loving relationship between herself and her children, the unequivocal recommendations of both the Law Guardian and the court-appointed psychologist support the Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the children were served by a change in custody, with liberal visitation being afforded to the mother. Thompson, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered January 21, 1999, which, after a [350]*350hearing, awarded the father custody of the parties’ two children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the father was better able than the mother to place the children’s needs before his own and to foster an ongoing relationship between the children and the noncustodial parent (see, Maloney v Maloney, 208 AD2d 603; Bostinto v Bostinto, 207 AD2d 471).

Although the mother presented evidence of a loving relationship between herself and her children, the unequivocal recommendations of both the Law Guardian and the court-appointed psychologist support the Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the children were served by a change in custody, with liberal visitation being afforded to the mother. Thompson, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 349, 705 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsough-v-hartsough-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack