HARTSOCK, EMMA v. SCACCIA, ROBERT T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 2011·No. CA 10-00872·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 278.2 CA 10-00872 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

EMMA HARTSOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TEMPORARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF ROY A. HARTSOCK, PLAINTIFF,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT T. SCACCIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, NASH-CAR SALES & SERVICE, E. DAVID NASHWINTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, JULIE’S SEABREEZE RESTAURANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LAW OFFICES OF TAYLOR & SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (DESTIN C. SANTACROSE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DIXON & HAMILTON, LLP, GETZVILLE (MICHAEL B. DIXON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 8, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendants Nash-Car Sales & Service and E. David Nashwinter for summary judgment dismissing defendant Robert T. Scaccia’s cross claim against them.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Hartsock v Scaccia ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [May 6, 2011]).

Entered: May 6, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARTSOCK, EMMA v. SCACCIA, ROBERT T., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

HARTSOCK, EMMA v. SCACCIA, ROBERT T. (HARTSOCK, EMMA v. SCACCIA, ROBERT T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.