Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Hartsin Construction Corp. v. Millhauser

Hartsin Construction Corp. v. Millhauser

136 Misc. 646, 241 N.Y.S. 428, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1198
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 23, 1930·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The premises being let solely for the carrying on of a business which was in violation of the zoning laws the lease was illegal. The provision under which the landlord, in the event of the issuance of an order against the existing use, undertook to make application to the board of standards and appeals for the modification of the zoning restrictions, the tenant agreeing to pay rent as long as she was permitted to remain in the premises, did not validate the instrument. •

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartsin Construction Corp. v. Millhauser, 136 Misc. 646, 241 N.Y.S. 428, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

136 Misc. 646 (Hartsin Construction Corp. v. Millhauser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
174 Misc. 2d 868 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
Thirty-Five Forty Thirtieth Street Corp. v. Straub Furniture Delivery Co.
41 Misc. 2d 948 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Bressler v. Amsterdam Operating Corp.
194 Misc. 76 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1949)
140 West Thirty-fourth Street Corp. v. Davis
158 Misc. 470 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Ober v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
157 Misc. 869 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1935)