Hartshorne v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hartshorne v. Johnson

7 N.J.L. 108

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 15, 1823

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.J.L. 108 (Hartshorne v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartshorne v. Johnson, 7 N.J.L. 108 (N.J. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that there must be a new trial. -'The defendants had a right to retain in their hands sufficient to pay -themselves for the transportation of the one hundred and thirty-four barrels, but for no inore. The possession, as to this, was never given up, or the lien destroyed. As to the validity of the judgment in attachment, we think we cannot look into it in this collateral way. We do not, however, consider this as coming in question here.

New trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that there must be a new trial. -'The defendants had a right to retain in their hands sufficient to pay -themselves for the transportation of the one hundred and thirty-four barrels, but for no inore. The possession, as to this, was never given up, or the lien destroyed. As to the validity of the judgment in attachment, we think we cannot look into it in this collateral way. We do not, however, consider this as coming in question here.

New trial granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.J.L. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartshorne-v-johnson-nj-1823.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack