Hartshorne v. Ingle
11 F. Cas. 719, 1 Cranch 91
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1802
StatusPublished
This text of 11 F. Cas. 719 (Hartshorne v. Ingle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartshorne v. Ingle, 11 F. Cas. 719, 1 Cranch 91 (circtddc 1802).
Opinion
[This was a suit by Hartshorne and Sons against Ingle.) The declaration was in debt upon an award. The capias was in case. There had been an office judgment and writ of inquiry; to set aside which E. J. Lee, for defendant, offered to plead a variance between the writ and declaration, in abatement. But THE COURT refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 719, 1 Cranch 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartshorne-v-ingle-circtddc-1802.