Hartshorn v. State

29 Ohio St. 635
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This is a good indictment against both •defendants. The offense of aiding, abetting, or procuring is a substantive and independent offense only in the sense that the offender may, under our statute, be tried and convicted without the trial or conviction of the principal offender. They are not distinct or separate offenses in the sense that both may not, as at common law, be charged in the same indictment, and in the same count thereof, and both offenders arraigned and tried thereon, as in cases where the defendants are jointly indicted for the same •crime or offense.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartshorn v. State, 29 Ohio St. 635 (Ohio 1876).

29 Ohio St. 635 (Hartshorn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gardner
2024 Ohio 1158 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
State v. Lester
2018 Ohio 3041 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Templeton, Unpublished Decision (3-14-2007)
2007 Ohio 1148 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Pizzoferrato, Unpublished Decision (5-23-2005)
2005 Ohio 2600 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Hickman, Unpublished Decision (12-13-2004)
2004 Ohio 6760 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State v. Graven
369 N.E.2d 1205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1977)
State v. Carver
285 N.E.2d 26 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
State v. Carver
283 N.E.2d 662 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1971)
Foster v. State
1 Ohio C.C. 467 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1886)