Hartshorn v. Hartshorn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hartshorn v. Hartshorn

27 A. 88, 67 N.H. 163

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1891·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

Giving a void note (Allen v. Deming, 14 N. H. 133) did not pay the debt for which it was given, nor discharge the defendant from his liability. Shaw v. Spooner, 9 N. H. 197; Burnham v. Spooner, 10 N. H. 165; Walker v. Lovell, 28 N. H. 138; Carleton v. Woods, 28 N. H. 290; Pecker v. Kennison, 46 N. H. 488.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter, J.

Giving a void note (Allen v. Deming, 14 N. H. 133) did not pay the debt for which it was given, nor discharge the defendant from his liability. Shaw v. Spooner, 9 N. H. 197; Burnham v. Spooner, 10 N. H. 165; Walker v. Lovell, 28 N. H. 138; Carleton v. Woods, 28 N. H. 290; Pecker v. Kennison, 46 N. H. 488.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Hartshorn v. Hartshorn, 27 A. 88, 67 N.H. 163 (N.H. 1891).

Pincite

27 A. 88 (Hartshorn v. Hartshorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related