Hartshorn v. Hartshorn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hartshorn v. Hartshorn

27 A. 88, 67 N.H. 163

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 A. 88 (Hartshorn v. Hartshorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartshorn v. Hartshorn, 27 A. 88, 67 N.H. 163 (N.H. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

Giving a void note (Allen v. Deming, 14 N. H. 133) did not pay the debt for which it was given, nor discharge the defendant from his liability. Shaw v. Spooner, 9 N. H. 197; Burnham v. Spooner, 10 N. H. 165; Walker v. Lovell, 28 N. H. 138; Carleton v. Woods, 28 N. H. 290; Pecker v. Kennison, 46 N. H. 488.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carpenter, J.

Giving a void note (Allen v. Deming, 14 N. H. 133) did not pay the debt for which it was given, nor discharge the defendant from his liability. Shaw v. Spooner, 9 N. H. 197; Burnham v. Spooner, 10 N. H. 165; Walker v. Lovell, 28 N. H. 138; Carleton v. Woods, 28 N. H. 290; Pecker v. Kennison, 46 N. H. 488.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A. 88, 67 N.H. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartshorn-v-hartshorn-nh-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack