Hartshorn v. Halsey

Connecticut Superior Court

Hartshorn v. Halsey

1 Root 92

DecidedSeptember 15, 1784

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 92 (Hartshorn v. Halsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartshorn v. Halsey, 1 Root 92 (Colo. Ct. App. 1784).

Pincite

Opinion

To this declaration the defendant demurred; because there is no averment, that said judgment and execution remain in force, unreversed and unpaid. The County Court judged said declaration to be insufficient; which judgment was reversed by the Superior Court upon the writ of error; because those averments are unnecessary in the declaration, in an action brought by an officer against the receiver of property taken ‘by execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To this declaration the defendant demurred; because there is no averment, that said judgment and execution remain in force, unreversed and unpaid. The County Court judged said declaration to be insufficient; which judgment was reversed by the Superior Court upon the writ of error; because those averments are unnecessary in the declaration, in an action brought by an officer against the receiver of property taken ‘by execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartshorn-v-halsey-connsuperct-1784.