Hartshorn v. Halsey
1 Root 92
Opinion
To this declaration the defendant demurred; because there is no averment, that said judgment and execution remain in force, unreversed and unpaid. The County Court judged said declaration to be insufficient; which judgment was reversed by the Superior Court upon the writ of error; because those averments are unnecessary in the declaration, in an action brought by an officer against the receiver of property taken ‘by execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartshorn v. Halsey, 1 Root 92 (Colo. Ct. App. 1784).
1 Root 92 (Hartshorn v. Halsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.