Hartsfield v. . Westbrook

2 N.C. 258
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 5, 1796
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 258 (Hartsfield v. . Westbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartsfield v. . Westbrook, 2 N.C. 258 (N.C. Ct. App. 1796).

Opinions

The swamp is to be considered as the boundary, but that this judgment may not be hurried, you may move the matter at another day. Should the opinion of the Court be altered in the meantime, they will then set aside the nonsuit now ordered.

The plaintiff was nonsuited.

A few days afterwards it was moved by General Davie that this nonsuit should be set aside, saying he wished the opinion of the court upon this point, because another suit was depending in court upon the same point, between Hartsfield and Fuller, which would be disposed of immediately should the Court be of opinion that the swamp was to be considered as the boundary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Den on Dem. Rogers v. Mabe
15 N.C. 180 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1833)
Rowe v. Cape Fear Lumber Co.
45 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
Whitaker v. Cover.
52 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)
Tallassee Power Co. v. Savage
170 N.C. 625 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsfield-v-westbrook-ncsuperct-1796.