Home/Supreme Court/Hartsfield v. Sloan

Hartsfield v. Sloan

357 U.S. 916
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 16, 1958
DocketNo. 683
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 357 U.S. 916 (Hartsfield v. Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartsfield v. Sloan, 357 U.S. 916 (1958).

Opinion

Motion of United States Conference of Mayors for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Brennan think that a rule [917]*917to show cause should issue. Morris B. Abram for petitioner. Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Freeman Lev-erett, Robert H. Hall, Assistant Attorneys General, and B. D. Murphy for the Secretary of State of Georgia, and Charles J. Bloch for Bell, Chairman, Georgia State Democratic Executive Committee, et al., filed briefs in opposition to the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. Wallace M. Cohen filed a brief for the United States Conference of Mayors, as amicus curiae, urging that the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gray v. Sanders
372 U.S. 368 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Scholle v. Secretary of State
116 N.W.2d 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1962)
Baker v. Carr
369 U.S. 186 (Supreme Court, 1962)
W.M.C.A. Inc. v. Simon
196 F. Supp. 758 (S.D. New York, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 U.S. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsfield-v-sloan-scotus-1958.