Hartsfield v. Palbicke

159 So. 924, 119 Fla. 473
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 924 (Hartsfield v. Palbicke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartsfield v. Palbicke, 159 So. 924, 119 Fla. 473 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case is from a final decree entered after testimony taken and considered on bill of complaint and amended bills of complaint and answers thereunto wherein the relief prayed was denied and the bill of complaint, the amendments thereto and amended bills of complaint were dismissed.

The bill of complaint, amendments thereto and amended bills of complaint sought to enjoin the issuance of a tax deed by the Clerk of the Circuit Court to the holder of certain tax sale certificates and to cancel the certificates' as clouds on the title of complainant.

There is no material difference between the objections presented here to the validity of the tax certificates here under consideration and the objections which were presented as to the validity of tax certificates attacked in the case of Aull v. Lidepa Corporation, et al., in which opinion was filed at this term of Court.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case and cases therein cited.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

, Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. *474 Whitfield, C. J., and Davis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 So. 924, 119 Fla. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsfield-v-palbicke-fla-1935.