Hartsfield, Darnell
This text of Hartsfield, Darnell (Hartsfield, Darnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NOS. PD-0394-10, PD-0395-10, PD-0396-10, PD-0397-10 & PD-0398-10
DARNELL HARTSFIELD, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS
RUSK COUNTY
Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.
Delivered: May 26, 2010
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hartsfield, Darnell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsfield-darnell-texcrimapp-2010.