Hartsfield, Darnell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 26, 2010·No. PD-0396-10·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NOS. PD-0394-10, PD-0395-10, PD-0396-10, PD-0397-10 & PD-0398-10




DARNELL HARTSFIELD, Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

RUSK COUNTY




           Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.


ORDER

           The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.

Delivered: May 26, 2010

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartsfield, Darnell, (Tex. 2010).

Hartsfield, Darnell (Hartsfield, Darnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.