Hartsfield Co. v. Demos

163 S.E. 219, 44 Ga. App. 802, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 527
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
Docket20733
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 163 S.E. 219 (Hartsfield Co. v. Demos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartsfield Co. v. Demos, 163 S.E. 219, 44 Ga. App. 802, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Bell, J.

Under instructions received from the Supreme Court in answer to a question certified in this case, the superior court erred in sustaining the certiorari to the extent of amending the judgment of the municipal court so as to allow interest on such judgment only at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. Under the contract sued on, the plaintiff was entitled to interest after judgment, as well as before, at the agreed rate of 3-1/2 per cent, monthly. 174 Ga. 43 (162 S. E. 138).

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co.
205 S.E.2d 110 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 S.E. 219, 44 Ga. App. 802, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsfield-co-v-demos-gactapp-1932.