Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

10 A.D.2d 864, 199 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10695

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1960·Published

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the petition, after trial, upon the grounds that the record does not show, as required by the enabling statute (L. 1950, ch. 402, § 4), that appellant was authorized to proceed with the condemnation of an easement, that there was reasonable effort to purchase prior to condemnation, or that there was necessity for such condemnation. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the petition, after trial, upon the grounds that the record does not show, as required by the enabling statute (L. 1950, ch. 402, § 4), that appellant was authorized to proceed with the condemnation of an easement, that there was reasonable effort to purchase prior to condemnation, or that there was necessity for such condemnation. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ.

Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., 10 A.D.2d 864, 199 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

10 A.D.2d 864 (Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.