Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

10 A.D.2d 864, 199 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10695

This text of 10 A.D.2d 864 (Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartsdale Public Parking District v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., 10 A.D.2d 864, 199 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the petition, after trial, upon the grounds that the record does not show, as required by the enabling statute (L. 1950, ch. 402, § 4), that appellant was authorized to proceed with the condemnation of an easement, that there was reasonable effort to purchase prior to condemnation, or that there was necessity for such condemnation. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.2d 864, 199 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsdale-public-parking-district-v-socony-mobil-oil-co-nyappdiv-1960.