Harton v. . Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Harton v. . Ross

155 S.E. 925, 199 N.C. 630, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 198

DecidedOctober 22, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 925 (Harton v. . Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harton v. . Ross, 155 S.E. 925, 199 N.C. 630, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 198 (N.C. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

This is an action to recover damages growing out of the collision of cars, alleged to have been negligently caused by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the- action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The cars in which the parties were traveling collided on a concrete bridge coated with ice. The plaintiff was injured and his car was damaged; but the injury and damage seem to have resulted from the condition of the highway and not from actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oueiam.

This is an action to recover damages growing out of the collision of cars, alleged to have been negligently caused by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the- action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The cars in which the parties were traveling collided on a concrete bridge coated with ice. The plaintiff was injured and his car was damaged; but the injury and damage seem to have resulted from the condition of the highway and not from actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 925, 199 N.C. 630, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harton-v-ross-nc-1930.