Hartmetz v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hartmetz v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Co.

123 A.D. 912, 108 N.Y.S. 1134

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1908·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with'costs to appellant -to abide event, upon questions of law and of fact. Held, that the finding of the jury that the defendant was-guilty of negligence which caused the injury was contrary to and against the-weight of the evidence. All concurred; Spring, J., voting for reversal upon the ground that material errors were committed by the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with'costs to appellant -to abide event, upon questions of law and of fact. Held, that the finding of the jury that the defendant was-guilty of negligence which caused the injury was contrary to and against the-weight of the evidence. All concurred; Spring, J., voting for reversal upon the ground that material errors were committed by the trial court.

Hartmetz v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Co., 123 A.D. 912, 108 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

123 A.D. 912 (Hartmetz v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.