Hartman-Walsh Painting Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hartman-Walsh Painting Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

694 So. 2d 226, 1997 La. LEXIS 1792, 1997 WL 294569

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 30, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-1290

StatusPublished

This text of 694 So. 2d 226 (Hartman-Walsh Painting Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman-Walsh Painting Co. v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, 694 So. 2d 226, 1997 La. LEXIS 1792, 1997 WL 294569 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Hartman-Walsh Painting Co.;— Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 0957; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 393,314.

Granted. Pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. arts. 966 E and 1915 B, the trial court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate the remaining issues in the case while the appeal of the partial summary judgment on liability is pending. Based on the reasons given by the trial judge, his decision to proceed with the issue of damages was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and set aside and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hartman-Walsh Painting Co.;— Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 0957; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 393,314.

Granted. Pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. arts. 966 E and 1915 B, the trial court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate the remaining issues in the case while the appeal of the partial summary judgment on liability is pending. Based on the reasons given by the trial judge, his decision to proceed with the issue of damages was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and set aside and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 So. 2d 226, 1997 La. LEXIS 1792, 1997 WL 294569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-walsh-painting-co-v-louisiana-department-of-transportation-and-la-1997.