Hartman v. United States

370 U.S. 724, 82 S. Ct. 1574, 8 L. Ed. 2d 801, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 860
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 25, 1962
Docket447 M
StatusPublished

This text of 370 U.S. 724 (Hartman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartman v. United States, 370 U.S. 724, 82 S. Ct. 1574, 8 L. Ed. 2d 801, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 860 (1962).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. United States
369 U.S. 749 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 U.S. 724, 82 S. Ct. 1574, 8 L. Ed. 2d 801, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-united-states-scotus-1962.