Hartman v. United States

Supreme Court

Hartman v. United States

370 U.S. 724, 82 S. Ct. 1574, 8 L. Ed. 2d 801, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 860

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 25, 1962·No. 447 M·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749; Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781.

Hartman v. United States, 370 U.S. 724, 82 S. Ct. 1574, 8 L. Ed. 2d 801, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 860 (1962).

Pincite

370 U.S. 724 (Hartman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related