Hartman v. Smith

821 N.E.2d 1024, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1402
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 2005·No. 2004-1543·Published

Opinion

Wayne App. No. 04CA0043. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On September 16, 2004, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within 14 days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartman v. Smith, 821 N.E.2d 1024, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2005).

821 N.E.2d 1024 (Hartman v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.