Hartman v. Port Huron Hospital
This text of 743 N.W.2d 212 (Hartman v. Port Huron Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Allen M. HARTMAN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary Lou Hartman, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PORT HURON HOSPITAL, Forrest Bryan Fernandez, M.D., and Jalal Ud-Din Akbar, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals because the plaintiff falls within the class of plaintiffs entitled to relief identified in our order in Mullins v. St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, 480 Mich. 948, 741 N.W.2d 300. We REMAND this case to the St. Clair Circuit Court for entry of an order denying the defendants' motion for summary disposition and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and the order in Mullins. In addition, we direct the St. Clair Circuit Court to enter an order granting the motion to substitute the successor personal representative as *213 the plaintiff in this action, consistent with MCL 700.3613.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
743 N.W.2d 212, 480 Mich. 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-port-huron-hospital-mich-2008.