Hartman v. Olvera

California Supreme Court

Hartman v. Olvera

49 Cal. 101

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

DocketNo. 4,282

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 101 (Hartman v. Olvera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman v. Olvera, 49 Cal. 101 (Cal. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

The defendant not having complied with the terms upon which the default and judgment had been set aside, both the default and judgment remained in force in the same manner as if the order for setting them aside had not been made.

The second application to set aside the default and judgment came too late, it having been made more than five months after the adjournment of the term at which the judgment had been entered.

Order of February 9, 1874, reversed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

The defendant not having complied with the terms upon which the default and judgment had been set aside, both the default and judgment remained in force in the same manner as if the order for setting them aside had not been made.

The second application to set aside the default and judgment came too late, it having been made more than five months after the adjournment of the term at which the judgment had been entered.

Order of February 9, 1874, reversed. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cal. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-olvera-cal-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack