Hartman v. Mayer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hartman v. Mayer

39 So. 2d 165, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 437

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 7, 1949·No. No. 3090.·Published

Opinion

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated cases of Mrs. Estelle D. Hartman v. Buffington S. Mayer, Jr., et al., and Buffington S. Mayer, Jr. v. Joseph H. Slaughter et al., La. App., 39 So.2d 166, it is ordered that the judgment in the above numbered and entitled cause in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, Joseph H. Slaughter, be amended by reducing the award made from the sum of $15,142.85 to the sum of $10,642.85 and as thus amended it be affirmed. The costs of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff and all other costs to be paid by defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated cases of Mrs. Estelle D. Hartman v. Buffington S. Mayer, Jr., et al., and Buffington S. Mayer, Jr. v. Joseph H. Slaughter et al., La. App., 39 So.2d 166, it is ordered that the judgment in the above numbered and entitled cause in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, Joseph H. Slaughter, be amended by reducing the award made from the sum of $15,142.85 to the sum of $10,642.85 and as thus amended it be affirmed. The costs of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff and all other costs to be paid by defendants.

Hartman v. Mayer, 39 So. 2d 165, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 437 (La. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

39 So. 2d 165 (Hartman v. Mayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related