Hartman v. Mayer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hartman v. Mayer

39 So. 2d 165, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 437

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 7, 1949

DocketNo. 3090.

StatusPublished

This text of 39 So. 2d 165 (Hartman v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman v. Mayer, 39 So. 2d 165, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 437 (La. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated cases of Mrs. Estelle D. Hartman v. Buffington S. Mayer, Jr., et al., and Buffington S. Mayer, Jr. v. Joseph H. Slaughter et al., La. App., 39 So.2d 166, it is ordered that the judgment in the above numbered and entitled cause in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, Joseph H. Slaughter, be amended by reducing the award made from the sum of $15,142.85 to the sum of $10,642.85 and as thus amended it be affirmed. The costs of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff and all other costs to be paid by defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated cases of Mrs. Estelle D. Hartman v. Buffington S. Mayer, Jr., et al., and Buffington S. Mayer, Jr. v. Joseph H. Slaughter et al., La. App., 39 So.2d 166, it is ordered that the judgment in the above numbered and entitled cause in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, Joseph H. Slaughter, be amended by reducing the award made from the sum of $15,142.85 to the sum of $10,642.85 and as thus amended it be affirmed. The costs of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff and all other costs to be paid by defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 So. 2d 165, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-mayer-lactapp-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack