Hartman v. May

47 A. 622, 18 Del. 512, 2 Penne. 512, 1900 Del. LEXIS 22
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMay 23, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 47 A. 622 (Hartman v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartman v. May, 47 A. 622, 18 Del. 512, 2 Penne. 512, 1900 Del. LEXIS 22 (Del. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

After hearing argument, Grubb, J., delivered the opinion of the Court as follows:

The Court

are of the opinion that these defendants, George W. May and Frank J. May, in the suit of Maria C. Hartman against them in this Court for libel, should be discharged on common bail; on the ground that the matter alleged as libelous in that suit was employed in the course of the pleadings in the suit now pending in the Court of Chancery of this State, and that for this Court, whilst it is pending there, to dispose of the question here, as to whether it is libelous or not libelous, would be interfering with the due administration of justice in the Court of Chancery, and this cannot be permitted by us on grounds of public policy.

We therefore order that the two defendants named be discharged on common bail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.
680 A.2d 1321 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
Berger, Lehman Associates, Inc. v. State
422 A.2d 268 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1979)
Sobolewski v. German
127 A. 49 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A. 622, 18 Del. 512, 2 Penne. 512, 1900 Del. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-may-delsuperct-1900.