Hartman v. Hartman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hartman v. Hartman

71 A. 417, 74 N.J. Eq. 851, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 286

DecidedNovember 16, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A. 417 (Hartman v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman v. Hartman, 71 A. 417, 74 N.J. Eq. 851, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 286 (N.J. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.

The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.

The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A. 417, 74 N.J. Eq. 851, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-hartman-nj-1908.