Hartman v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hartman v. Hale

285 A.D. 949, 139 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D. 949 (Hartman v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartman v. Hale, 285 A.D. 949, 139 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to consolidate the seven actions granted. There are issues common to all actions to be tried. There is also an especially valuable policy to be served by consolidation in this type of situation (see Benjamin v. Benjamin, 283 App. Div. 455). Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to consolidate the seven actions granted. There are issues common to all actions to be tried. There is also an especially valuable policy to be served by consolidation in this type of situation (see Benjamin v. Benjamin, 283 App. Div. 455). Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 A.D. 949, 139 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-hale-nyappdiv-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack