Hartman v. Church Construction Co.
143 A. 917, 103 N.J. Eq. 371, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 669
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 513.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Parker, Katzenbach, White, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartman v. Church Construction Co., 143 A. 917, 103 N.J. Eq. 371, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 669 (N.J. 1928).
143 A. 917 (Hartman v. Church Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kean v. Union County Park Commission
18 A.2d 279 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)