Hartman v. Carman
This text of 162 A.D. 895 (Hartman v. Carman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think there was evidence to justify the submission to the jury of the question as to the defendant’s negligence and as to the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.D. 895, 146 N.Y.S. 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-carman-nyappdiv-1914.