Hartman v. Caddington
258 A.2d 740, 255 Md. 651, 1969 Md. LEXIS 744
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 20, 1969
Docket[No. 106, September Term, 1969.]
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 258 A.2d 740 (Hartman v. Caddington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartman v. Caddington, 258 A.2d 740, 255 Md. 651, 1969 Md. LEXIS 744 (Md. 1969).
Opinion
The appeal must be dismissed because there was no final judgment below from which an appeal could be taken. After a jury verdict, appellants filed a motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative a new trial and the trial court granted a new trial.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Albert W. Sisk & Son, Inc. v. Friendship Packers, Inc.
604 A.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1992)
Archie's Steak House, Inc. v. Joe Rosenthal & Sons, Inc.
270 N.W.2d 591 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
258 A.2d 740, 255 Md. 651, 1969 Md. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-caddington-md-1969.