Hartman v. Axelrod
478 N.E.2d 202, 64 N.Y.2d 971, 489 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16672
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (103 AD2d 863).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartman v. Axelrod, 478 N.E.2d 202, 64 N.Y.2d 971, 489 N.Y.S.2d 61, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16672 (N.Y. 1985).
478 N.E.2d 202 (Hartman v. Axelrod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blase v. Axelrod
111 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)