Hartman Realty Co. v. Local 150 United Mechanics
This text of 180 Misc. 524 (Hartman Realty Co. v. Local 150 United Mechanics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Service upon the manager of the tenant was no compliance with sectionT3 of the General Associations Law. The court therefore acquired no jurisdiction over the tenant. An objection to the court’s jurisdiction may be taken by answer (Lloyd v. Sloan, 259 App. Div. 615).
Final order and judgment reversed, with twenty dollars costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, dismissing the proceeding with costs, without prejudice to a new proceeding.
Hammer, Shten-tag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 Misc. 524, 42 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-realty-co-v-local-150-united-mechanics-nyappterm-1943.