Hartman Realty Co. v. Local 150 United Mechanics
180 Misc. 524, 42 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1954
Opinion
Service upon the manager of the tenant was no compliance with sectionT3 of the General Associations Law. The court therefore acquired no jurisdiction over the tenant. An objection to the court’s jurisdiction may be taken by answer (Lloyd v. Sloan, 259 App. Div. 615).
Final order and judgment reversed, with twenty dollars costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, dismissing the proceeding with costs, without prejudice to a new proceeding.
Hammer, Shten-tag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartman Realty Co. v. Local 150 United Mechanics, 180 Misc. 524, 42 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
180 Misc. 524 (Hartman Realty Co. v. Local 150 United Mechanics) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caines v. Prudential Insurance
8 Misc. 2d 789 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)