Hartman Pacific Co. v. Estee
229 P. 326, 131 Wash. 697, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 844
This text of 229 P. 326 (Hartman Pacific Co. v. Estee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartman Pacific Co. v. Estee, 229 P. 326, 131 Wash. 697, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 844 (Wash. 1924).
Opinions
On Rehearing.
Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein, as reported in 127 Wash. 151, 219 Pac. 867, and the judgment of the superior court is therefore reversed and the cause remanded to that court with direction to enter a judgment in favor of the respondent for nominal damages only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmetto Coal Co.
40 F.2d 374 (Fourth Circuit, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
229 P. 326, 131 Wash. 697, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-pacific-co-v-estee-wash-1924.