HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. v. Dailey

Michigan Supreme Court

HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. v. Dailey

712 N.W.2d 724, 474 Mich. 1132

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 4, 2006

Docket129733

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 712 N.W.2d 724 (HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. v. Dailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. v. Dailey, 712 N.W.2d 724, 474 Mich. 1132 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

712 N.W.2d 724 (2006) 474 Mich. 1132

HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,
v.
Steven DAILEY and Janine Dailey, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellees, and
George H. Presley, and ABN-AMRO, d/b/a Standard Federal Bank, Defendants, and
Jeffry R. Hartman, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 129733 & (79)(80). COA No. 249847.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 4, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the questions involving the Michigan Consumer Protection Act's application to residential builders. We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of Liss v. Lewiston Richards, Inc., 474 Mich. 1133, 712 N.W.2d 724 (2006), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

712 N.W.2d 724 (2006) 474 Mich. 1132

HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,
v.
Steven DAILEY and Janine Dailey, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellees, and
George H. Presley, and ABN-AMRO, d/b/a Standard Federal Bank, Defendants, and
Jeffry R. Hartman, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 129733 & (79)(80). COA No. 249847.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 4, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the questions involving the Michigan Consumer Protection Act's application to residential builders. We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of Liss v. Lewiston Richards, Inc., 474 Mich. 1133, 712 N.W.2d 724 (2006), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 N.W.2d 724, 474 Mich. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-eichhorn-building-company-inc-v-dailey-mich-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack