Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co. v. Dailey

703 N.W.2d 496, 266 Mich. App. 801
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 2005·No. 249847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

703 N.W.2d 496 (2005)
266 Mich. App. 801

HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
v.
Steven DAILEY and Janine Dailey, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
George H. Presley and ABN-AMRO, d/b/a Standard Federal Bank, Defendants, and
Jeffry R. Hartman, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 249847.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

June 22, 2005.

ORDER

The Court orders that a special panel shall not be convened pursuant to MCR *497 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Forton v. Laszar, 239 Mich.App. 711, 609 N.W.2d 850 (2000), lv. den. 463 Mich. 969, 622 N.W.2d 61 (2001), for the reason that the conflict is not outcome-determinative. MCR 7.215(J)(3)(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co. v. Dailey, 703 N.W.2d 496, 266 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005).

703 N.W.2d 496 (Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co. v. Dailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc
732 N.W.2d 514 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)