Hartman, D. v. Bank of New York

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 18, 2015·No. 91 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/KA : No. 91 EM 2015 THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS : TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE : HOLDERS OF CWALT, INC. : ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005- : 86CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH : CERTIFICATE SERIES 2005-86CB C/O : BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., : : Respondent : : : v. : : : DOROTHY HARTMAN, : : Petitioner : :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2015, the Application for Extraordinary

Relief or King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartman, D. v. Bank of New York, (Pa. 2015).

Hartman, D. v. Bank of New York (Hartman, D. v. Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.