Hartling v. Sawicksky

223 A.2d 396, 154 Conn. 729
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 1, 1966·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in New London County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartling v. Sawicksky, 223 A.2d 396, 154 Conn. 729 (Colo. 1966).

223 A.2d 396 (Hartling v. Sawicksky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.