Hartling v. Sawicksky
223 A.2d 396, 154 Conn. 729
This text of 223 A.2d 396 (Hartling v. Sawicksky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartling v. Sawicksky, 223 A.2d 396, 154 Conn. 729 (Colo. 1966).
Opinion
It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in New London County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 A.2d 396, 154 Conn. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartling-v-sawicksky-conn-1966.