Hartline v. State
129 S.E. 123, 34 Ga. App. 224, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
Opinion
The indictment charged the defendant with manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The jury returned a verdict of attempting to manufacture such liquor. The evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict rendered, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartline v. State, 129 S.E. 123, 34 Ga. App. 224, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
129 S.E. 123 (Hartline v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bridges v. State
126 S.E.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Harper v. State
94 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Coffee v. State
148 S.E. 303 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Raines v. State
132 S.E. 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)