Hartline v. State

129 S.E. 123, 34 Ga. App. 224, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16547
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 129 S.E. 123 (Hartline v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartline v. State, 129 S.E. 123, 34 Ga. App. 224, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The indictment charged the defendant with manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The jury returned a verdict of attempting to manufacture such liquor. The evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict rendered, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur. B. T. Brock, J. M. Lang, for plaintiff in error. O. 0. Pittman, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridges v. State
126 S.E.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Harper v. State
94 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Coffee v. State
148 S.E. 303 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Raines v. State
132 S.E. 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 123, 34 Ga. App. 224, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartline-v-state-gactapp-1925.