Hartline, Pets v. PSERB
This text of Hartline, Pets v. PSERB (Hartline, Pets v. PSERB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JOANNE G. HARTLINE, JOAN B. : No. 138 MAL 2015 KUMMERER, HELEN MARIE MOYER, : REGINA HILT, NADINE K. LYDIC, : CAROL L. CULP, CAROL S. KLINE, : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from JEANNETTE A. RAUTZHAN, DAVID G. : the Order of the Commonwealth Court SLIDER, DOREEN Y. CECHAK, KAREN : A. KATRINAK, KATHRYN A. KIRK, JANE : A. PRUTZMAN, RICHARD A. SACHS, : BRENDA G. MARION, RONALD D. BUTT, : SUSAN C. ONDO, CYNTHIA CASE : WAMPLER, MARGARET M. : SCHELLINGER, PAULA T. FENERTY, : PATRICIA M. THOMPSON, SUSAN : VISHIO FORRY, TERRY WALSH, : PAMELA FERRARO, SUSAN M. FIX, : CYNTHIA R. WERSTLER, ROXANNE : FOX, GLEN A. BRUMBACH, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' : RETIREMENT BOARD, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hartline, Pets v. PSERB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartline-pets-v-pserb-pa-2015.