Hartley v. Tapley
This text of 68 Mass. 565 (Hartley v. Tapley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This question has very recently been under the consideration of the court. The rule is, that wages to be earned under an engagement existing at the time of giving the order are assignable; but not money to be earned hereafter under a new engagement. Emery v. Lawrence, 8 Cush. 151. Mulhall v. Quinn, 1 Gray, 105. The particular fact that the workman was employed to work by the piece does not affect the general fact that he was uninterruptedly in the employ of the defendant during all the time in question.
Judgment for the defendant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Mass. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-tapley-mass-1854.