Hartley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hartley v. State

1950 OK CR 45, 217 P.2d 188, 91 Okla. Crim. 141, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 5, 1950

DocketNo. A-11171

StatusPublished

This text of 1950 OK CR 45 (Hartley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartley v. State, 1950 OK CR 45, 217 P.2d 188, 91 Okla. Crim. 141, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199 (Okla. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

The defendant, Thurlow Walter Hart-ley, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county for the misdemeanor of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and pursuant to the'verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs, and has appealed.

No brief has been filed on behalf of defendant and no appearance was made in his behalf at the time the case was assigned for oral argument. Under those circumstances, the record will be searched for fundamental error and if none is found the judgment will be affirmed.

The evidence shows that two officers saw the defendant driving his Buick automobile on the streets in the [142]*142town of Mountain Park while he was intoxicated. We have found no substantial error in the record. The judgment and sentence of the county court of Kiowa county is accordingly affirmed.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES, P. J.

The defendant, Thurlow Walter Hart-ley, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county for the misdemeanor of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and pursuant to the'verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and costs, and has appealed.

No brief has been filed on behalf of defendant and no appearance was made in his behalf at the time the case was assigned for oral argument. Under those circumstances, the record will be searched for fundamental error and if none is found the judgment will be affirmed.

The evidence shows that two officers saw the defendant driving his Buick automobile on the streets in the [142]*142town of Mountain Park while he was intoxicated. We have found no substantial error in the record. The judgment and sentence of the county court of Kiowa county is accordingly affirmed.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1950 OK CR 45, 217 P.2d 188, 91 Okla. Crim. 141, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1950.