Hartley v. State
151 So. 3d 556, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19923, 2014 WL 6900834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hartley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 146 →
Opinion
We treat petitioner’s motion for extension of time as a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for purposes of exercising our jurisdiction. However, we find that petitioner has failed to establish good cause to extend the time for filing such a petition. See Chance v. State, 65 So.3d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Accordingly, we deny relief and dismiss this proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartley v. State, 151 So. 3d 556, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19923, 2014 WL 6900834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
151 So. 3d 556 (Hartley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chance v. State
65 So. 3d 1176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)