Hartley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hartley v. State

572 So. 2d 34, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1991 WL 514

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 4, 1991

DocketNo. 89-02532

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 So. 2d 34 (Hartley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartley v. State, 572 So. 2d 34, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1991 WL 514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a nonjury trial the appellant was found guilty and was convicted of several offenses. We find no merit in his argument on appeal attacking those convictions.

However, as the state concedes, the judgment entered against the appellant by the trial court incorrectly states that the appellant entered a plea of guilty. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand for the entry of an amended judgment reflecting that the appellant was tried and found guilty.

Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI