Hartley v. State
572 So. 2d 34, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1991 WL 514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 1991·No. No. 89-02532·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
After a nonjury trial the appellant was found guilty and was convicted of several offenses. We find no merit in his argument on appeal attacking those convictions.
However, as the state concedes, the judgment entered against the appellant by the trial court incorrectly states that the appellant entered a plea of guilty. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand for the entry of an amended judgment reflecting that the appellant was tried and found guilty.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartley v. State, 572 So. 2d 34, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 30, 1991 WL 514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
572 So. 2d 34 (Hartley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. State
635 So. 2d 1080 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)