Hartley v. Smith

105 S.E. 725, 26 Ga. App. 212, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 74
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1921·No. 11241·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

I. Where a man dies leaving, as a part of his estate, hank stools not fully paid for, and the stools is set aside to his widow and her minor children as a year’s support, “ after all the just debts are paid,” and, upon presentation to the bank of a certified copy of the year’s support proceedings, the bank issues to the widow alone a certificate which shows 60 % paid in and assessable, ” the receivers of the bank can obtain a legal general judgment against the widow for the amount of the balance due of the purchase-money for the stock. It was not error to direct a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for the balance due upon the certificates of stock, and in thereafter overruling the motion- for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., anid Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents. Evans & Evans, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Price, J. B. Phillips, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartley v. Smith, 105 S.E. 725, 26 Ga. App. 212, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

105 S.E. 725 (Hartley v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartley v. Smith
111 S.E. 743 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)