Hartley v. Murphy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hartley v. Murphy

144 So. 788

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 16, 1932

DocketNo. 4352.

StatusPublished

This text of 144 So. 788 (Hartley v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartley v. Murphy, 144 So. 788 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

DREW, J.

This is a companion suit to No. 4353, 144 So. 785, this day decided by this court; the two being consolidated for trial and submitted on the same testimony.

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries she received in the accident wherein defendant’s car and the one she was riding in, and driven by her daughter, collided at the intersection of Stubbs avenue and North Sixth street in the city of Monroe.

The lower court rejected her demands, and she has appealed. There is no answer to the appeal; therefore the exception of no cause of action filed in the lower court and overruled is not before us for consideration.

■For the reasons assigned in case No. 4353, this day decided, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, with costs.

MeGREGOR, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, J.

This is a companion suit to No. 4353, 144 So. 785, this day decided by this court; the two being consolidated for trial and submitted on the same testimony.

Plaintiff sued for personal injuries she received in the accident wherein defendant’s car and the one she was riding in, and driven by her daughter, collided at the intersection of Stubbs avenue and North Sixth street in the city of Monroe.

The lower court rejected her demands, and she has appealed. There is no answer to the appeal; therefore the exception of no cause of action filed in the lower court and overruled is not before us for consideration.

■For the reasons assigned in case No. 4353, this day decided, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, with costs.

MeGREGOR, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 So. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-murphy-lactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack