Hartley v. Hartley

121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 4, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Poster.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swatze, Teen-chard, Parker, Bergen, Kadis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartley v. Hartley, 121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690 (N.J. 1923).

121 A. 138 (Hartley v. Hartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.