Hartley v. Hartley

121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 4, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 121 A. 138 (Hartley v. Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartley v. Hartley, 121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Poster.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swatze, Teen-chard, Parker, Bergen, Kadis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-hartley-nj-1923.