Hartley v. Hartley
121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Poster.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swatze, Teen-chard, Parker, Bergen, Kadis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartley v. Hartley, 121 A. 138, 94 N.J. Eq. 792, 9 Stock. 792, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 690 (N.J. 1923).
121 A. 138 (Hartley v. Hartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.