Hartley v. Hartley
This text of 118 S.E. 763 (Hartley v. Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “Before a sale of personal property is complete, the statute provides not only that there must be ‘ consent of the parties ’ and ‘ an identification of the thing sold,’ but also ‘ an agreement as to the price to be paid.’ Civil Code (1910), § 4106.” Dudley v. Taylor, 22 Ga. App. 715, 716 (97 S. E. 91).
2. Applying the above ruling to the facts of the instant ease, the verdict of the jury finding the property subject was not contrary to law and the evidence, and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 S.E. 763, 30 Ga. App. 674, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-hartley-gactapp-1923.