Hartley v. Hartley

522 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 894, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1356, 1988 WL 29171
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1027
StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 1050 (Hartley v. Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartley v. Hartley, 522 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 894, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1356, 1988 WL 29171 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

Appellant, Jack Hartley, contends that the trial court erred in determining that the parties had an equal interest in certain real property in North Carolina that was found by the trial court to be owned by appellant’s mother, and in failing to specify the type of alimony that was awarded to the wife, Evelyn Hartley. The wife concedes that error was committed as to these two points. We agree.

Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the award to the wife of the equal interest in the North Carolina proper[1051]*1051ty and to specify the type of alimony awarded to the wife.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 1050, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 894, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1356, 1988 WL 29171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-hartley-fladistctapp-1988.