Hartley v. Florida Department of Corrections

954 So. 2d 684, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5561, 2007 WL 1108435
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 2007
Docket1D06-1063
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 954 So. 2d 684 (Hartley v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartley v. Florida Department of Corrections, 954 So. 2d 684, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5561, 2007 WL 1108435 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

954 So.2d 684 (2007)

Drew C. HARTLEY, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

No. 1D06-1063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 16, 2007.

Drew C. Hartley, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Mark J. Hiers and Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a petition for extraordinary relief; however, the circuit court case file fails to show a record of the petition filed below. Because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Petitioner has tendered to this court a copy of the petition for extraordinary relief which includes a date stamp on the face of the pleading showing that it was given to prison officials for mailing on August 7, 2005. Accordingly, within 30 days, petitioner shall file with the Washington County Circuit Court a copy of the petition for extraordinary relief which includes the date stamp on the face of the pleading. See Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The circuit court shall immediately determine whether the petition is properly filed in Washington County and, if not, the circuit court shall transfer the petition to the correct jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(b)(2). If the petition is determined to be properly filed in Washington County, the circuit court shall thereafter rule forthwith.

PETITION DENIED.

KAHN, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ingram v. State
60 So. 3d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Brookins v. State
49 So. 3d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
CASEN v. McDonough
962 So. 2d 977 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Brown v. Woodard
961 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Sullivan v. State
954 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
954 So. 2d 684, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5561, 2007 WL 1108435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartley-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2007.